A new review study finds there is no evidence
in earlier scientific studies indicating that genetically engineered feed crops
harmed the health or productivity of livestock and poultry, and that food
products from animals consuming such feeds were nutritionally the same as
products from animals that ate non-GMO feeds. Globally, food-producing animals consume 70
to 90% of genetically engineered (GE) crop biomass. This review briefly
summarizes the scientific literature on performance and health of animals consuming
feed containing GE ingredients and composition of products derived from them.
It also discusses the field experience of feeding GE feed sources to commercial
livestock populations and summarizes the suppliers of GE and non-GE animal feed
in global trade. Numerous experimental studies have consistently revealed that
the performance and health of GE-fed animals are comparable with those fed
isogenic non-GE crop lines. United States animal agriculture produces over 9
billion food-producing animals annually, and more than 95% of these animals
consume feed containing GE ingredients.
Green soybean plants, mixed organic and GMO |
Data
on livestock productivity and health were collated from publicly available
sources from 1983, before the introduction of GE crops in 1996, and
subsequently through 2011, a period with high levels of predominately GE animal
feed. These field data sets, representing over 100 billion animals following
the introduction of GE crops, did not reveal unfavorable or perturbed trends in
livestock health and productivity. No study has revealed any differences in the
nutritional profile of animal products derived from GE-fed animals. Because DNA
and protein are normal components of the diet that are digested, there are no
detectable or reliably quantifiable traces of GE components in milk, meat, and
eggs following consumption of GE feed. Globally, countries that are cultivating
GE corn and soy are the major livestock feed exporters. Asynchronous regulatory
approvals (i.e., cultivation approvals of GE varieties in exporting countries
occurring before food and feed approvals in importing countries) have resulted
in trade disruptions. This is likely to be increasingly problematic in the
future as there are a large number of "second generation" GE crops
with altered output traits for improved livestock feed in the developmental and
regulatory pipelines. Additionally, advanced techniques to affect targeted
genome modifications are emerging, and it is not clear whether these will be
encompassed by the current GE process-based trigger for regulatory oversight.
There is a pressing need for international harmonization of both regulatory
frameworks for GE crops and governance of advanced breeding techniques to
prevent widespread disruptions in international trade of livestock feed stuffs
in the future.
Posted By:-
Biotechnology Department